Our Hydrogen Tanks go Boom! Boom!
Literally... Are we looking at the next generation M1 tank powered by a hydrogen fuel cell? Could the army be trying to reduce i...
https://automology.blogspot.com/2013/11/our-hydrogen-tanks-go-boom-boom_21.html
Literally...
Are
we looking at the next generation M1 tank powered by a hydrogen fuel
cell? Could the army be trying to reduce its carbon bootprint?
Absolutely they are and they are already at a stage of advanced
development; the artist representation pictured above is set to become
a reality sometime soon.
The
US army turning green is in fact old news. For years the military has
been at the forefront of developing alternative energy to make the
assortment of military forces as efficient as possible; this is true of
many of the world’s militaries. From fighter jets running on biofuel to
soldiers in Afghanistan with solar powered backpacks, one of the biggest
challenges has been how to make the ground combat vehicles more eco
friendly whilst still putting the fear of god into the enemy.
Since
the days of the WWII Blitzkrieg favoured by the Wehrmacht forces,
battlefields have become increasingly mechanised. This means that there
is a need for massive quantities of fuel, usually diesel. The average US
combat trooper uses some 22 gallons of fuel a day, quite a total
especially if you are in enemy territory where you have to transport
this fuel in. In Afghanistan, the US forces have had to truck this fuel
in through sometimes hostile, sometimes friendly Pakistan; the convoys
are regularly blocked and regularly attacked.
Pictured
above is the proposed next generation main battle tank that will run
using hydrogen fuel cell technology being developed by General Motors, a
platform that is thought will help solve the problem for an ever
expanding electronics requirement on the modern battlefield that the
current on-board generator is finding difficult to cope with. Apart
from the obvious reduction of reliance on imported oil and gas, a side
benefit for the fuel cell electric armoured vehicle (FCEAV) is that the
engines are pretty much silent and, thus, as the tank advances, all you
may well hear is the sound of twigs snapping and not the cacophony of
sound that the current M1 Abrams 1000hp turbine engine produces.
Much
of the development is being undertaken by GM at the US Army’s Tank and
Automotive Research Development and Engineering Centre or TARDEC. The
joint collaboration is with a company that was almost bankrupt just a
few short years ago, but is in fact logical as GM is without a doubt the leader in fuel cell electric vehicle (FCEV) technology. As long ago as 1966, GM created the first fuel
cell vehicle and has filed a number of fuel cell patents since 2002.
Perhaps
just as significant as the tie-up with TARDEC, GM in conjunction with
Honda Motor Co are working to develop the next generation fuel cell
system and hydrogen storage technology. It is thought that much of this
technology will trickle down to the consumer perhaps as early as 2020,
although FCEVs will be on sale in California at least by the end of 2014.
|
The GM-TARDEC systems are still
being tested in the labs and it will be some time until we see the first
of the next generation mainline battle tanks, but not so for our next
candidate. This one is here already, so feast your eyes on this here bad
boy:
Maybe not the most attractive of fighting vehicles. The offering from
Northrop Grumman and BAE Systems of the UK was first tested in 2007. The
hybrid GCV has been specifically designed to modernise the US army and
provide soldiers with a decisive edge against adversaries. It is powered
by what is described by BAE as a hybrid electric drive (HED) system,
which apparently affords greater force protection and up to 20% greater
mobility.
The
hybrid GCV is firmly in the planning of the US Army’s Future Combat
Systems (FCS) programme that will see the military utilise hybrid tanks
as a way of fuelling supply lines faster and putting fewer lives at risk.
According to BAE’s website, the HED is “the next logical step for the
US Army, and now is the time for soldiers to reap the benefits that
hybrid will bring to the battlefield.”
If
you have read any of our previous articles on hydrogen fuel cells, you
will realise that there are many critics of this technology, but the
fact is even if you do not agree, there are significant advantages to
FCEVs. The technology is gaining wide acceptance and, dare we even say,
momentum. When the first KERS based hybrids came upon us, they were
widely criticised. However, the Toyota Prius is currently the number 1
seller for Toyota in California. Unlike pure battery electric vehicles
(BEV), both hybrids and FCEVs can be refuelled in minutes and, so, seem
attractive, but where is the hydrogen coming from and how is it
generated?
If
you believe all of the hype that hydrogen is all around us, understand
that it needs to be converted into a form that we can use. This can be
done using renewables such as solar, wind and biomass, but currently
most hydrogen is created by using natural gas. So the claim that the
only emission from FCEVs is water vapour is perhaps misleading and needs
more scrutiny, and we still have to transport the hydrogen to the fuelling stations, during which it is still prone to interception or
blockade. So perhaps there are some flaws to the technology.
Although
the cost of hydrogen fuel cells is prohibitive at the moment due to the
amount of technology and precious metals that are contained in them,
the US Department of Energy, in conjunction with the National Academy of
Science, has offered an estimate that by 2030, the cost of an FCEV will
be about USD34 000 in comparison to their estimate for a BEV, which is
just under USD35 000. Of course critics will tell you that there has to
be massive investment in fuel delivery infrastructure for the FCEV to
win the day whilst pure BEV can allegedly utilise existing technology.
image sources: electrovelocity.com, inhabitat.com |